Estudos Científicos, Artigos e Resoluções
Efetuados por centenas de cientistas e jornalistas pelo mundo todo
|2011||Council of Europe – Resolution 1815 (2011)|
The potential dangers of electromagnetic fields and their effect on the environment
Committee on the Environment, Agriculture and Local and Regional Affairs Rapporteur: Mr Jean HUSS, Luxembourg, Socialist Group (SOC)
|2018||5 G wireless telecommunications expansion: Public health and environmental implications|
This article will review relevant electromagnetic frequencies, exposure standards and current scientific literature on the health implications of 2G, 3G, 4G exposure, including some of the available literature on 5G frequencies. The question of what constitutes a public health issue will be raised, as well as the need for a precautionary approach in advancing new wireless technologies.
|The human skin as a sub-THz receiver – Does 5G pose a danger to it or not?|
The world is galloping towards a bright new future, or at least so industry would like us to think. The advent of 5 G promises unforetold connectivity and unparalleled integration with the virtual world (Agiwal et al., 2016). Technology will interact with almost every aspect of our daily lives (Boccardi et al., 2014), as well as expose us to rich and varied data streaming on our cellular and Wi-Fi devices. While all of this may be true it comes with a price tag. To afford such heavy data traffic we must accept an expansion in data channels (Ben Ishai et al., 2016), something that is not possible in the currently used frequency channels, and an attendant explosion in base stations (Ge et al., 2016). This is the rational to move to 5 G, a FCC standard, which will start at 28 GHz (FCC Report 16–89), soon utilize frequencies up to 60 GHz and may eventually reach the sub – Terahertz range (FCC 50–50 Report).
|Genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields|
The duration and frequency of mobile phone calls and the association observed with various health effects has raised serious concerns due to the frequency with which these devices are used and the way they are held close to the head. The present review assesses the results of in vitro, in vivo, experimental, and epidemiological studies. The purpose of the study is to assess data concerning the carcinogenic and genotoxic effects of non-ionizing EMF.
|2020||5G Danger: 13 Reasons 5G Wireless Technology Will Be a Catastrophe for Humanity|
5G (5th Generation) is now being actively rolled out in many cities around the world. Simultaneously, as awareness over its horrific health and privacy impacts is rising, many places are issuing moratoriums on it or banning it, such as the entire nation of Belgium, the city of Vaud (Switzerland) and San Francisco (USA). Radiofrequency radiation (RF or RFR) and electromagnetic fields (EMF) are being increasingly recognized as new types of pollution – environmental pollution. Here are 13 reasons exposing the 5G danger, which could turn into an unmitigated health and privacy catastrophe if enough people don’t rise up to stop it.